David Green's Page
Gifts Received
David Green has not received any gifts yet
Latest Activity
Only one small glitch so far on page 35 about Jesus' return in 70AD being the antitype for the high priest coming out of the holy of holies on the day of atonement. (Lev 23) The resurrection fulfilled that type - not 70AD.
Hi Robin,
Can you plea...
Hi Chuck, :)
If any of those guys have read House Divided, I'll bet they're praying that nobody reads Mike's chapter. I can't even read that chapter without cringing in embarrassment for Mathison et al. The contradictions that Mike uncovered betw...
Or:
"How to Attack Hyper-Preterism with Ad Hominems and '2,000 Years of Church History!,' and Lose."
William Hill of Covenant Radio and Dr. J. V. Fesko took exception to a statement I made about "forensic justification." Here's what they said (audio and text) and my response:
http://fullpreterism.com/davidgreen/the-theological-novum-of-the-refor...
Hi David,
That's the first I've heard of that book. By the sound of it ("disgust," "very telling"), I'd say it will be a "tell all" exposé helmed or at least co-authored by Roderick Edwards, displaying the evil character and despicable deeds of "...
Robin, where did you order the book? Amazon.com?
Hi Sam, :)
From a strictly superficial and surface standpoint, our belief can be made to appear like another gospel: "No one in 2,000 years of church history ever believed this! This is a radical departure from the history of the church! You're d...
Hi Curtis,
You asked: "Why do we/you/Authors confess the creeds as necessary? Necessary for what?"
My answer: Without a unified tradition of belief, we cannot say that there is "one faith." When I speak of the necessity of the ecumenical creeds,...
Hi Alan, :)
I agree that the creeds contain truths that are authoritative and that we must confess those truths and that we must submit to those truths because they are derived from Scripture.
However, if that is true, then we can't make a flat,...
Hi Sharon, :)
I agree that FPism demands that many areas of our theology must be "tweaked." In at least some cases though, the "tweaking" involves an amplification or clarification of the elements of Reformed theology. For example, the Reformatio...
[Sam Frost wrote:]
> > 1st Premise: “All Councils….may err.”
> >
> > 2nd Premise: “He shall come again was
> > formed within the Council”
> >
> > Conclusion: “Therefore, This Council may have erred.”
> >
> > Perfect logical syllogism. What’s the p...
Jason wrote: Read the whole convo Dave and stop cherry picking.
My response: It is your part in "the whole convo" that has offended members or visitors here who have written to me about your use of offensive language, Jason. Please stop putting y...
Jason Bradfield wrote: you get in an environment like the pizza joint i'm in every night and using "shit" is considered fairly mild and acceptable by all. crap...shit...no difference there. .....i wonder if a lot of the hub bub over it is just a b...
Jason Bradfield wrote: "....or, they'll ask us, like one did to me, to basically keep hush about alot of what i believe (not just eschatology). I see no point in going to be a pew sitter."
My response: If your overall beliefs (not just preterism)...
Hi Jordan, :)
You wrote: .....how can we just look at a snapshot of our life at any one day and, by THIS standard, know we're "in"?
I'm not saying that we judge ourselves by "a snapshot of our life at any one day." I'm not saying that we look at...
Comment Wall (14 comments)
- At 1:37am on October 29, 2009,
Matthew Schultz said…
- Hello David. Thank you for the add!
Blessings,
Matthew.
- At 12:03pm on July 15, 2009,
Prabhu Das said… - Brother David could you please help us with a copy of your brand new book "House Divided"?
- At 9:53pm on July 5, 2009,
Prabhu Das said…
- Brother I’ve posted a Question “CHURCH NAME???” at blog post section. And I would like to know your comments, could you please….?
- At 3:39pm on February 8, 2009,
BillyG said… - Welcome David! This is a busy little site. Lots of fun and informative too!
- At 1:04pm on February 8, 2009,
Michael Bennett said… - Dave - finally - so good to have you here. Your "answers" section was one of the main reasons I went from Partial to Full (after questions in my mind would come up I would search your answers section etc). Thanks for EVERYTHING that you do brother.
- At 11:07am on February 8, 2009,
James Kessler said… - Welcome to the site Dave.
- At 1:28am on February 8, 2009,
Sharon Nichols said… - Well Hi there Dave! How ya doing? Welcome aboard!
BTW, just recently I've been back into studying logic. That book you so graciously sent me a couple years ago was my starting point and just recently I downloaded the lecture series given by Robbins onto my MP3 player. It;s been very helpful. Also, I found a workbook which goes along with both, so its been a fun study. Again, thanks a ton for sending me the book!
Really good to see you here. :o))
Blessings,
Sharon Marie
- At 12:57am on February 8, 2009,
David Lee said… - Welcome!
- At 10:54pm on February 7, 2009,
Laurie said… - Welcome David~ I look forward to your input. Hope you enjoy the fellowship.
- At 10:17pm on February 7, 2009,
Chuck said… - David, I live about 5 miles from Sam down here in the sub-freezing Brandon area. I have a great friend who I introduced to preterism that lives in Opelika.
If you have time to add some bio info that would be great. I'd like to know how you came to the Lord and then your voyage to preterism.
Thanks. See ya around.
Profile Information
- Relationship Status:
- Single
- Website:
- http://www.preteristcosmos.com
About
© 2009 Created by Michael Bennett on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
