Ed J. Young was a distinguished OT scholar (he taught at Wesminster for years). He wrote a little book simply called, Genesis 3 (Banner of Truth Trust, 1966). I was re-reading this little book out on the backporch of my freshly mowed lawn (nothing like the smell of a mowed yard in the Summer) and leapt from the chair when I read the following:
"Eve followed what is sometimes called the 'scientific method.' She believed herself capable of evaluating all the facts of reality, including the fact of God and his commands, and passing upon them an impartial judgment. It was knowledge that she sought."
Further, Young relates that the in the Egyptian language "good and evil" was "a synonym for the expression, 'everything.'" If a person knew good and evil they knew everything.
This is exactly the nature of their fall. God knows good and evil comprehensively. Eve was lured, through her own observation and perception, to desire knowledge. What, then does it mean to be "like God, knowing good and evil"? Notice, too, that when Paul wrestles with himself in Romans 7 he uses the words, "good," "evil," and "know." There, even when does the good, the evil is ever present.
Now, to be like God. God determines knowledge. He Himself is Absolute Truth. This says something for the Christian concerning the definition of "truth." How did God derive this knowledge of good and evil? Observation? Hardly. God has known all things from eternity. His knowledge is derived from his own being. This is what Eve set out to be.
Man now had the ability to determine for himself what is good and evil, just like God. Man could now make law and enforce the judgment of that law. Man could now determine without any reference but himself what was good and evil. After all, isn't that all law is for? To determine what is legal and illegal, right and wrong, good and evil? Since God said that He created the earth and heavens in 6 days, man would follow with his own cosmogenies - man would determine the comprehensive origins of the world - and he would do so based upon his own observations - the scientific method. Man would define ethics, culture, law, origins - he would build his own picture and determine his own destiny - so he thought.
This is, essentially, what living "in the world" involves. Notice, again, Paul: "and the sin did enter and the death through the sin into the WORLD." What specific "sin" ("the sin") is Paul addressing? The one we are addressing here. The "world" is the "lust of the eyes" - the world is the place wherein man has asserted himself and his own laws and own religions. He has made powerful arguments - seducing arguments that sometimes even the best of Christians are snared (Christian evolution, etc.). He claims that he can tell us how the planets rotate - how the universe was formed - and since the Bible is not really defining these things "in a scientific way", then our knowledge of the universe is far more superior.
Ask yourself. Modern science arose within Christendom. However, within a very short span of a few hundred years, science has thrown off its Christian origins. Man, armed with the knowlegde of Adam and Eve, eventually throws off "what God hath said." It refuses to do its work within the confines of God's Word. Stay ever mindful of this fact. Listen to yourself and critically be aware of how you arrive at the conclusions of the day. Where did you get that "knowledge" from? Jesus, or Adam?
Sam
Tags:
Share
You need to be a member of Sovereign Grace Preterism to add comments!
Join this social network